Members thought that “Environmental Recreation” was the easiest to implement and lowest cost design, noting that it would be a nice benefit to stakeholders. However, a few pointed out that it does not support our renewable energy mission. “Research and Production” was appreciated for its fit with the plant and with our mission to produce energy locally. There was concern that the cost does not justify production on this site that does not have high quality agricultural land. People were concerned that both “Research and Production” and “Energy Education” would not support themselves financially. Energy Education received positive responses for its alignment with our renewable energy mission. Members were excited about including education to engage the community in our project. “Energy Education” was also seen as an opportunity to draw new members. Someone voiced concern over encouraging the use of food crops for oil production. Another was unsure whether micro-hydro is legally feasible on our land, (in response to the fact that there is a stream running through the property). Overall, “Energy Education” was most popular, followed by “Research and Production” then “Environmental Education.”

Here are the 3 designs.                                             Member Thoughts

	"This option might produce income for Co-op Power through educational programs, as well as educate other communities about the possiblities of becoming more energy self-sufficient." "I think this is an important educational opportunity. This could be accomplished in a passive mode, partnering with GCC's faculty, the area high schools." "Will be a benefit to all interested members. Could be a selling point for increasing membership"
	"By combining education, recreation and research,  allows Co-op Power to enhance understanding and appreciation of locally produced renewable energy sources. I think this would enhance Co-op Power's standing as well as the local public's opportunity to buy into eco-friendly energy management." "it shows how manufacturing can live beside wild land" "keeps land open for public use. low cost"
	"Directly (in time) fulfills our mission of bringing sustainable energy sources to our area." "Potential to generate income in sustainable manner." "This option speaks directly to the cycle of oil and energy production. Who will be the farmer?" "local production, new sources, no impact on current supply & price. local growers' press"

More Thoughts (in pie form!).